Lawsuit Filed Over Search and Gambling Ads

Yahoo!, Google, and major Web sites are named in a suit targeting search ads for online gambling sites.

Yahoo, Google, and several other major Web sites and companies (including ClickZ’s publisher, Jupitermedia) have been hit with a lawsuit saying they carry online gambling ads in violation of California law. This comes after two of the major search companies earlier this year made moves that were supposed to remove online gambling ads entirely.

The suit was filed on behalf of all Californians and specifically names two. One of them used search engines to find online gambling sites and lost $100,000, it’s claimed.

Although online gambling may be illegal in California, it’s unclear whether just carrying ads for online gambling that are seen by people within the state is illegal. The lawsuit requests this be deemed the case:

By this action, plaintiffs seek to have defendants’ paid advertisement of Internet gambling in California declared illegal, seek to enjoin defendants from advertising unlicensed Internet gambling businesses to persons in California.

As I’ve written before, removing ads won’t prevent access to such material through editorial listings. The plaintiff who lost money could just as easily have found an online gambling site through a non-paid search engine listing. The only difference is the search engine would have earned no money from the click.

The filing also attempts to make ads for “illegal gambling” appear different because of the “astounding” click rate of $12.97 shown in one instance compared to “modest” prices for other products and services.

Of course, terms like “mesothelioma” and “structured settlement” have consistently hit Overture’s $100 max price per click for months. Law firms seeking clients have contributed to driving up those prices. A high bid price, it’s fair to say, doesn’t indicate the legality (or otherwise) of a product or service.

Both Yahoo and Google were supposed to have removed online casino ads by the end of April, following apparent pressure from the U.S. government. Nevertheless, they continued — and still seem to appear. The lawsuit documents some examples. (Posts on the Search Engine Watch Forum support this. A longer version of this column also illustrates how such ads continue.)

In reaction to the U.S. government’s pressure, a new lawsuit just filed on behalf of Casino City claims online gaming advertisements are protected by First Amendment free speech rights.

This column was adopted from ClickZ’s SearchEngineWatch.com. A longer, more detailed version is available to paid Search Engine Watch members.

Want more search information? ClickZ SEM Archives contain all our search columns, organized by topic.

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Experience Economy
Report | Digital Transformation

Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Experience Economy

2y

Engagement To Empowerment - Winning in Today's Exp...

Customers decide fast, influenced by only 2.5 touchpoints – globally! Make sure your brand shines in those critical moments. Read More...

View resource
Announcement Alert from Lee Arthur
Weekly briefing | Digital Transformation

Announcement Alert from Lee Arthur

2y

Announcement Alert from Lee Arthur

Announcement Alert!! Read More

View resource
The 2023 B2B Superpowers Index
Whitepaper | Digital Transformation

The 2023 B2B Superpowers Index

3y

The 2023 B2B Superpowers Index

The Merkle B2B 2023 Superpowers Index outlines what drives competitive advantage within the business culture and subcultures that are critical to succ...

View resource
Impact of SEO and Content Marketing
Whitepaper | Digital Transformation

Impact of SEO and Content Marketing

3y

Impact of SEO and Content Marketing

Making forecasts and predictions in such a rapidly changing marketing ecosystem is a challenge. Yet, as concerns grow around a looming recession and b...

View resource